Other Non-US Editions: PolandSpainFinland and Croatia                  

   
 Home   Products   Genetic Roulette   The GMO Trilogy   Seeds of Deception   Media Center   Speeches and Workshops   Take Action   Newsletter   Buying Non·GMO   About Genetically Modified Foods   rBGH in Dairy Products   L·tryptophan   Links   Contact Us 
 
   
 
About Genetically Modified foods
FAQs
GM Foods at a Glance
Health Risks Brochure
rBGH in Dairy Products
Testimony to EPA - May 2007
Dangers of Genetically Engineered Foods
Genetically Modified Foods are Inherently Unsafe
Case Study on Industry Research: Soy Study by Monsanto
Genetically Engineered Foods Pose Higher Risk for Children
Inhaled GM Maize Pollen May Cause Disease
GM Food Promoter Transfers to Rat Cells
GM Vaccines Recombine into Unpredictable Hybrid Viruses in Human and Animal Cells
High Mortality of Rats in Russian Study
See Also Newsletter and Monthly Column

US Consumers Have Been Given a False Sense of Security
About the Safety of Our Food Supply

You may have heard the FDA and food industry claims that genetically modified (GM) foods are safe, properly tested, and necessary to feed a hungry world. UNTRUE! Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are one of the most dangerous and radical changes to our food supply. These largely unregulated ingredients found in 60-70% of the foods in the US, are well worth the effort to avoid them.

Many consumers in the US mistakenly believe that the FDA approves GM foods through rigorous, in-depth, long-term studies. In reality, the agency has absolutely no safety testing requirements. Instead the agency relies on research from companies like Monsanto, research that is meticulously designed to avoid finding problems.

It’s easy to understand the FDA’s industry-friendly policy on regulation of GMOs when you see the revolving door between agency regulators and the companies they regulate. The White House mandate to the FDA (under the first George Bush) was to promote biotechnology and the person in charge of developing the agency’s policy at that time was a former Monsanto attorney, who later returned to Monsanto as their vice president.

The FDA has claimed it was not aware of any information showing that GM crops were different “in any meaningful or uniform way,” from non-GMO crops and therefore didn’t require testing. But 44,000 internal FDA documents made public by a lawsuit show that this was a complete lie. The overwhelming consensus among the FDA’s own scientists was that GM foods were quite different and could lead to unpredictable and hard-to-detect allergens, toxins, new diseases and nutritional problems. It turns out that FDA scientists, who had urged superiors to require long-term studies, were ignored. See, Failed Government Regulation.

Even though evidence of this apparent fraud at the FDA was presented at a Washington, D.C. press conference in 1999 with major media in attendance, the media didn’t alert the public.  In fact, most Americans know so little about this subject, that only about 1 in 4 consumers even know if they’ve ever eaten a GM food in their lives, even though the vast majority of processed foods contain derivatives from the four major GM crops: soy, corn, cottonseed and canola. See, GM Foods at a Glance.

 

 Home   Products   Genetic Roulette   The GMO Trilogy   Seeds of Deception   Media Center   Speeches and Workshops   Take Action   Newsletter   Buying Non-GMO   About Genetically Modified Foods   rBGH in Dairy Products   L-tryptophan   Links   Contact Us 
 

Yes! Books, P.O. Box 469, Fairfield, Iowa 52556 |  Institute for Responsible Technology 
Phone: +1.641.209.1765
Fax: 888-FAX-7000 (888-329-7000)
 

PureZing Seal Of Approval
Endorsed by Pure Zing

Powered by Full Partner